Laws That Contradict

situate Laws That departs Federal Laws Which champion mustiness We Fallow? country Laws That Contradict Federal Laws Abstract This Paper rationalizes using proof and some facts from researched sites and articles on the internet using sites like Google as a research source. This also going to show some views that the muckle save on this musical theme. We forget adjoin information and ideas on this publication (How press out Laws Contradict Federal Laws) t present all going to be disparate opinions because we all cook different views on this question (Which One Should Fallow.? . Im here to open your mind and interest you in this subject to see what your opinion is on this. This article will explain you this. You will see 1 article on a plaza of wen a terra firma justness contradicts a national virtue and 2 view of what people think we should do each whizz of course different. This paper will answer some questions we might study of or think of. Hope you catch some interest and confide it opens a new perspective to you and you get interested in this topic. State Laws That Contradict Federal LawsQuestions we might have and ask in our minds here are some than again this is on some web pages online you poop think otherwise you will see examples throughout this report and see why people might say this. Every question will be answered and you will see examples What happens if a state impartialityfulness contradicts the US Constitution or a federal official law? Whathappenswhen astatelawconflicts with afederallaw? If astatelawconflicts with afederallawwhichlawwill prevail? Which should we unbroken? In case a individual violets one of this laws by doing other what happens?These and more questions tidy sum be in our mind and yeah we compulsion an answer to this so Ill try to a answer these and more. rifle ready to learn some stuff we didnt know. State Laws That Contradict Federal Laws A very important state law that contradicts federal law is the rankd hemp. In some states they have legalized it for people that have health problems than again whats the point of having a state law that allows you to prescribe marijuana when FBl muckle arrest you for violating the Federal law.How can they allow it in some states when its supposed to be a drug and is taboo and against all law to have it or consume it? We have seen galore(postnominal) issues that have happened when it comes to this like people making pretender prescriptions to obtain it and the deal of it. It has been something we have tried to battle against and the police and states try to end tho how can they end something when is the own state thats the approving the legalization. m some(prenominal) people are confused about the legality of medical approach shot to marijuana. first gear text from online site (First and foremostMarijuana, foranyuse,is illegal under federal law. Even if you live in a state that has enacted legislation or passed a ballot in itiative that recognizes marijuanas medical utility you are subject to arrest by federal officials for possession or cultivation of marijuana. ( base on this we see that the text is saying that it is illegal under federal law even if u lived in a state where it is legal you would contract a ballot or an ID of authorization.I think this is a good demeanor of keeping it from going into the wrong hands but yet thither are always ways people forfeit documents and make fake prescriptions to get that Id there should be more ways of verification. ) Federal Laws The Controlled Substances issue classifies halter as a Schedule I drug and defines it as a drug with no accepted medical value in treatment. Despite its long history of use as a medication, cannabis is classified as a new drug and legal penetration is only possible through an Investigational New Drug Application (IND) issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This helps to see the medical past of the person asking for the drug even though people use it as a pain reliever they should do this drug for people that have very severe drug issues. What do you think should they give it to any sick person or to the ones that have really severe illnesses? ) State Laws Beginning in 1978, the states began responding to pleas from the seriously ill for legal access to marijuana for medical purposes. Thirty-four stateshave enacted laws which recognize marijuanas medical value.Many of these laws authorized state research programs which would allow citizens to gain legal access to marijuana. Several states actual complicated research programs which gave their citizens limited access to legal supplies of medical marijuana. These programs were short-lived, however. interlocking federal regulations and the continuous intervention of federal officials made such programs in any case difficult for most states to administer. This state law has many different views and sides you can take. Like you can be in favor of allowing it yet you can also be against.So here is the question which one should we fallow? Based on the supremacy claw if the state law contradicts the federal law you have to fallow the federal law so if we fallow the federal law that means that any patient with severe illness and who passes plaudit of his/her application should get the illegal drug than again only if passed investigation (IND Investigational New Drug Application) What happens if someone violates the law? If state has there different laws and penalties and regulations that occur when violating their terms or abusing there.Reference page Question 1 Pg. 3 http//wiki. answers. com/Q/What_happens_if_a_state_law_contradicts_the_US_Constitution_or_a_federal_lawixzz26xSIZOoV Question 2 Pg. 3 http//wiki. answers. com/Q/What_happens_if_a_state_law_contradicts_the_US_Constitution_or_a_federal_lawixzz26xUDqStq Question 4 Pg. 3 http//wiki. answers. com/Q/What_happens_if_a_state_law_contradicts_the_US_Constitution_or_a_federa l_lawixzz26xUDqStq First text in parenthesis http//www. marijuana-as-medicine. org/Federal%20%20State%20Law. htm