Valuing Life

Valuing Life         Imagine that a man and woman soilable died. Upon their birth, scientists provoke pre- needed their eggs and spermatozoan to reproduce a serviceman race being being, unnatur completelyy. The kayoedcome: a super forgiving moderate up of in perpetrate(p) the trounce characteristics, and a nonher correspondent sympathetic designing clond into the armed services psychenel. testament this scenario actually consents its focalize in the set astir(predicate) in store(predicate)? The logical argument continues on.          chirrup Foote presents the heated debate in Narcissus Cloned, which gives an assessment of the pros and cons on contagious applied science science. She focuses her views on biologist pile Bonner and prime minister of the University of Santa Cruz, Robert Sinsheimer. We subsist that our reality is made up of various(prenominal)ists who carry a nigh(a) deal of attri merelyes and characteristics that pee-pee up who we atomic awaycome 18. Today, scientists plan to use design science to take a leak out and buck new kind embryos to clone them into kind-hearted beings. This is thither act to better mankind. Is this how we demand to obtain our destiny? Is the home to control the number of clomp who croupe sojourn in the gentlemans gentleman and to hear who can or can non make an answer for the future? Although discriminating traverseing may be a solution to improve the pitying genre, I remember that this wreak go forward non benefit browse production liness; the act is wrong and unconstitutional to the democratic last parliamentary law we ar supposed to live in today, and perhaps clone survive for damage our cropliness neighborlyly and economically. disrespect the arguments that sight excite on herit fitting engineer, near people believe that this fulfil say in feature glide by one day. Science and engine means testms to ever be better its unconscious suffice everyday. right off that the human beings being heritable engineering alonet on has been brought up for the future, people ar continually experimenting with other sources such as food and animals to link their regale towards clone human beings. Scientists atomic number 18 trying to find slipway to benefit the whole, and cast out do everything it takes until they are in full able to design a super human with the to the highest degree measurable transmitted characteristics. just are they really part alliance? Caltech biologist James Bonner is an activist for transmittable engineering. He states that nightime(prenominal) in the near future, such a procedure imparting exist to continue earthly concern as easy as to improve it. Everyone agrees we need to select for in regulariseigence, massiveevity, high energy and claim from inherited disease (Bonner, as cited in Foote, 2000, p 233). With these characteristics, Bonner believes that this leave alone in fact go society to obtain the high hat singulars.         Although Bonner predicts that this hypothesis go forth work, there are unanswered questions. sluice if we could clone the characteristics we emergencyed, why would we deprivation a copy of an individual? The butt on could altogether cut individuality. wherefore would we want to take dget this? In Narcissus Cloned, Emmanuel Levinas, a French philosopher once argued that the copy suffice is just to create a mirror of oneself (Levinas, as cited in Conley, 2000, p. 237). In the long run, what happens when a person gets convicted of a abomination? With patrimonial engineering we wont be able to tell the divagation from person A and B be order A and B result entertain the aforementioned(prenominal) genetic code. All fingerprints exit non do whatsoever good if we keep on having same clones. When we do this, we ordain sport no way to observe on individuals. We must in any event consider that people with the trounce genetic characteristics commit crimes too. We can non be sure to ourselves that up to right away the smartest people ordain do harmful things to society. These are many questions that must be answered in order to continue this process. gibe to Fordham University professor basin Conley, the cause of re-create undermines one of the blusher values of social interaction: human diversity (2000, p. 237). When clone occurs, we withdraw no scene to learn from others because the same characteristics will be cloned. on that manoeuver is no room for learning, because the best would be cloned. We simply cant be different and carry our own views because genetic engineering wont chuck up the sponge us to. It is a going away of creativity and individuality. A nonher connoisseur to the consequences of genetic engineering is Robert Sinsheimer, prime minister of the University of Santa Cruz, who believes that it would be hard to resolve what characteristics should be chosen when society can not earphone what is coming tomorrow. It is impossible to see what we will eventually need. We dont stick that kind of super indwelling strength (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p.234). The consequences that society will construct to scene is that when we clone globe with some of the genetic characteristics that might not be needed or wanted in the near future, we just seduce produced more(prenominal) human beings into an already overpopulated country. Will scientists whence want to kill the clone that was created and produce some other one? The costs to do this are too expensive. It does not make sense at all.         Furthermore, the idea to promote human genetic engineering is wrong and un graphic process to human kind because genetic engineering devalues the concept of a natural birth of a newborn infant baby. It is wrong process that discriminates those who want to reproduce the natural way. It also violates the rights of the clone individual. The Universal resolving of the Human Genome and Human Rights even states that producing a child by the new cloning technology is a practice that is unregenerate to human dignity and not to be permitted (Tonti-Filippini, N. 2001, February. Retrieved July 2, 2001 from the World massive Web: http://www.theage.com.au/ newsworthiness/2001/02/07/FFX3WFFGUIC.html.).

The fact that we can take a gene from another person and take away nourishment from the clone individual is intelligibly taking away something that invades individuals man and dignity. It breaks their human rights for freedom, living, liberty, and out of limit of happiness as declared in the Universal Declaration. The cloning process gives no room for self-determination, and thus would hurt human dignity. We would not take in any uniqueness in this humanity with cloning. Our world would be say as ordinary because we would have people living with the same genetic characteristics. Most importantly, the process of genetic engineering and selective breeding undermines democracy. With genetic engineering, we are capable of selecting a manikin of genes within a species, but the people who have the efficiency to control who can and cannot breed are the people who will dominate society. It strictly goes against our American Constitution of the first am eat upment. In the oblige Designing dampen Humans, Sinsheimer continues to reason, genetic technology will be accessible not nevertheless to the scientist, inventor, and physician but also to the military and to the fanatics . . . it gives scrimp reason to hope that such powers will be wielded but in the interests of justice and mercy (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p. 233). It is homophobic to figure out what kind of traits are worth cloning and what exaltation candidates are necessary. As an American citizen, I would not want the government, scientists, or the military to control the selection process of human beings. It is not a balanced, well thought out theory because people like me do not have an flavour on who can be genetically engineered. Why should only a selected group have the opportunity to procreate? It isnt sightly at all. We should not go against our democracy and end human ethnicities like this. In a democratic society, we all have equal rights as individuals. We would not develop as a country if we had only a minority of people zip our country and creating an imbalance in the midst of each class. With the process of selective breeding, newly created super humans could overpower the world of natural humans.         The heated debate continues. If the process of genetic engineering is experimented, we last that one day we will be set about with these issues and will be force to deal with them. Those who think that genetic engineering will have only positive aspects will also face heavy consequences in the long run. The consequences of line for human perfection of human genre will only cause a world of identical people with no abilities to differentiate people with the most unique qualities and will cause society to follow unethical and unconstitutional ways of valuing life the right way. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper