Religious Believers Understand More Essay

To discuss this statement first we must look at the definition of reckoning. unearthly recallrs and scientists would belike differ in their definitions and at that enjoinfore resist from the beginning. A religious person would perhaps say that understanding the public means knowing how to be a in effect(p) person, how to kick the bucket a good life and fulfill perfections plan. A scientist would probably disagree, saying that understanding the cosmea is having a wide knowledge and good comprehension of how the world works including theories like evolution and understanding why and how things occur. Another slight problem with this statement is its implication that one cannot be a religious believer and a scientist when in fact there are many religious scientists who seem to have science and piety existing harmoniously in their lives. If we are defining understanding as understanding how to live a good life, then I believe that the Bible and apparitional Believers do und erstand more about the world than Scientists do.Religious Believers have a better understanding of how the universe and mans place in it was set up, and its hard for people to understand correctly because its not in scientific terms, its in myths and metaphors. You cant see it with our available scientific instruments, its something you experience. Religious Believers have direct focusing from their Holy texts, e.g. for the Jewish faith, the Torah on how to live their life. They are taught, by the Ten Commandments, that they are not to steal, not to extract adultery and not to murder.One criticism of scientists is that a number of self-assertion are made to give parameters to an experiment. Also perception can be fallible, as we expect to see things, so we see them. We dont expect to see them, so we miss them out. In response to this, in the parable the invisible gardener where the religious believer trusts that the gardener came but couldnt be seen and the other (scientist) bel ieving that there couldnt be a gardener because there was no empirical evidence of this. This shows that nonetheless though there was no evidence of the gardener or God they still hold a belief, whereas the scientist had to be turn out. Some claim that believers entirely want hope.Religious Believers hope for the return of their invisible gardener, epoch New Atheists (Richard Dawkins and his followers) have no expectations of a new life afterward death, thereforelive their lives without fear of an almighty God smiting them down. In this situation, one could argue that the Religious Believer is playing it safe, however they still understand the world better, in many cases they see it as an almighty beings creation.In conclusion, I believe that, although Scientists have proof of the age of the earth, and that they have proven many facts of the Earth, They do not have as good guidance as Religious Believers do on understanding life.